AI Crawler Checker
Paste your robots.txt and see which AI crawlers it lets in — and which of the blocked ones were the ones that could have cited you.
| Crawler | What it is for | Blocking it costs you | Your file says |
|---|---|---|---|
GPTBot |
Training | Nothing in citations. Blocking it keeps your text out of future training runs and does not affect whether ChatGPT can quote you today. | |
ChatGPT-User |
Live retrieval | Citations. Block this and the page cannot be opened, summarised or linked while someone is asking about your topic. | |
OAI-SearchBot |
Search index | Citations. This is the crawler that decides whether you appear in ChatGPT search at all. | |
ClaudeBot |
Training | Nothing in citations, on the same logic as GPTBot. | |
Claude-User |
Live retrieval | Citations, in the same way as ChatGPT-User. | |
Claude-SearchBot |
Search index | Citations. | |
anthropic-ai |
Training | Nothing either way. Leaving the line in costs nothing and removing it gains nothing. | |
PerplexityBot |
Search index | Citations, and directly. Perplexity puts numbered sources next to every claim; blocking this removes you from that list. | |
Perplexity-User |
Live retrieval | Citations, where the rule is honoured at all. | |
Google-Extended |
Training and grounding | Some. It does not touch Search or AI Overviews, but it does cover grounding in the Gemini apps, so blocking it can take you out of answers there. | |
Googlebot |
Search index | Everything. There is no separate opt-out for AI Overviews: the only controls are nosnippet, max-snippet and data-nosnippet, which limit how much text can be shown rather than whether you appear. | |
bingbot |
Search index | Bing and Copilot together. People block bingbot to save crawl budget and lose both at once. | |
Applebot |
Search index | Visibility inside Apple products. | |
Applebot-Extended |
Training | Nothing in search. Disallowing it leaves Applebot's indexing untouched. | |
Meta-ExternalAgent |
Training | Nothing in citations. | |
Meta-ExternalFetcher |
Live retrieval | Citations inside Meta AI. The pair is the clearest illustration of the split: same company, two tokens, two completely different decisions. | |
Amazonbot |
Search index | Answers on Amazon's surfaces. | |
Bytespider |
Training | Little for most sites outside its markets. This is usually a bandwidth decision, not a visibility one. | |
CCBot |
Public dataset | Nothing in citations. Note that blocking it only affects future crawls — whatever is already in the archive stays there. | |
cohere-ai |
Training | Probably nothing. Included because your file likely names it. | |
Diffbot |
Commercial dataset | Nothing directly. It can feed the entity data some tools resolve brands against, which is a second-order argument for leaving it alone. | |
Timpibot |
Search index | Very little today. A small index. | |
omgili |
Commercial dataset | Nothing in citations. | |
DuckAssistBot |
Live retrieval | Citations in DuckDuckGo's answer box. |
This catalogue was compiled in September 2026. Tokens get renamed, split and retired — before you act on a row, check it against the operator's own crawler documentation. The purpose and cost columns are a judgement about what each bot is for, not a quotation from anyone.
Nothing you type here is uploaded, stored or sent anywhere. It all runs in your browser.
Training and retrieval are two different decisions
Almost every argument about blocking AI crawlers collapses because the two sides are talking about different bots. There are, roughly, three jobs:
- Training crawlers collect text to build the next model.
GPTBot,ClaudeBot,Meta-ExternalAgent,CCBot. Blocking them is a licensing decision. It does not remove you from anything a user sees today. - Retrieval agents fetch one page, now, because someone asked a question it might answer.
ChatGPT-User,Claude-User,Perplexity-User,Meta-ExternalFetcher. Blocking these takes you out of answers that would have linked to you. - Search crawlers build the index those answers are drawn from.
OAI-SearchBot,PerplexityBot,Claude-SearchBot,Googlebot,bingbot. Blocking these is the same decision as blocking a search engine, which is to say it is almost never what you meant.
The mistake we see most often is a single copied block that disallows twenty tokens at once — lifted from a blog post, never read — which keeps you out of AI answers while the training corpora that already contain your 2023 archive are entirely unaffected. If you want to be cited and not trained, you have to separate the two, and the operators that offer that separation have published the tokens to do it with.
How this tool decides
It implements the matching rules from RFC 9309, the same ones a search engine uses. Three of them catch people out:
- Groups are not inherited. If a crawler has its own
User-agentblock, the rules underUser-agent: *do not apply to it at all — not in addition, not as a fallback. A group ofUser-agent: GPTBotwith an emptyDisallow:gives GPTBot more access than everyone else, including your admin paths. - The longest matching rule wins, not the first.
Disallow: /blog/andAllow: /blog/public/together permit the public folder, whichever order they are written in. - Matching is by token, not by substring.
User-agent: Claudedoes not matchClaudeBot. Tokens are matched whole and case-insensitively, so a near-miss is a rule that quietly does nothing.
What robots.txt cannot do
It is a request, honoured voluntarily. The bots in the table above are the ones that publish a token and, as far as anyone can observe, respect it — that is precisely why they are in a table. Scrapers that do not identify themselves are a different problem with a different answer, and that answer is at the server or the CDN, not in this file. Blocking a crawler also does nothing about content of yours that is quoted, syndicated or reposted elsewhere: the copy on someone else's domain is governed by their robots.txt, not yours.
Then what?
Once you know what you are allowing, use the AI Crawler Control Generator to write the rules you actually meant, and the AI Search Readiness Checker to see whether the pages you are letting them reach are written in a way anything can quote.
Questions people ask
Does blocking GPTBot remove me from ChatGPT?
No. GPTBot is OpenAI’s training crawler. What fetches your page during a conversation is ChatGPT-User, and what indexes it for ChatGPT search is OAI-SearchBot. Blocking GPTBot alone leaves both of those working.
Can I block AI Overviews without leaving Google Search?
Not by presence. Google-Extended covers Gemini, not Search, and AI Overviews are generated from the Search index, so the only way to be absent from them is to be absent from Search. The partial controls are nosnippet, max-snippet and data-nosnippet, which limit how much of your text can be displayed.
Why does this tool say a bot is allowed when my file lists it?
Usually one of three things: the token is spelled differently from the published one, the rule sits above the User-agent line instead of below it, or the crawler has its own group and the Disallow you meant for it is sitting in the group for everyone else. The matched rule is shown next to each verdict so you can see which.
Is a blocked AI crawler the same as a noindex?
No, and confusing the two is how sites disappear. robots.txt stops the fetch; noindex stops the indexing and requires the fetch to happen so the directive can be read. A page blocked in robots.txt can still be listed with no description, because the block prevented the crawler from ever seeing the noindex.
Is my robots.txt uploaded anywhere when I paste it?
No. The parsing and matching run in your browser. This page has no backend and makes no network request with anything you type.
Related tools
Being crawlable is the floor, not the ceiling
Letting the right bots in only makes you eligible to be quoted. What makes a model treat you as worth quoting is the same thing that always mattered: other people referencing you.